The Election Of The Conservative Party Leadership

What, if anything, was new about Thatcherism? The ballot for the Conservative Party Leadership on February 1975 was a turning point for the History of late 20th century politics in England. The figure of Margaret Thatcher had emerged surprisingly as the new Party leader against the incumbent Edward Heath. Thatcher’s importance does not only lies on she being the first woman to lead the Conservative Party, but on the ideas and statecraft that later gave life to a new concept –Thatcherism- that marked British politics during her 11 years in command and managed to influence the future of England’s politics. However, the main point of disagreement and discussion has been what was really Thatcherism and Margaret Thatcher’s ideology†¦show more content†¦She also wanted to make Britain a competitive trading nation. Furthermore, she took the ideas of the Scottish political economist Adam Smith, whom she considered the most important theorist of free trad e. The Wealth of Nations (1776) advocated for removing restrictions that were aimed to advantage national good towards exterior goods. Thatcher wanted to embrace free trade as this would encourage producers and traders. Finally it would stimulate competitiveness and innovation, creating greater wealth and everyone would benefit. The result of these ideals winded up in a revolution in economic policy and three elections won by Margaret Thatcher and the Conservative Party. However there is a thin line between the fact that these ideals were not firstly hers – Victorian values, free trade, monetarism, etc. - making Thatcherism seem as a mixture of well-known goods, and the fact that Margaret Thatcher did introduced such a new statecraft that as a consequence the new ‘ism’ after her name continued for years after she was no longer Prime Minister. It is argued that Margaret Thatcher did not instigate this intellectual revolution and indeed it was the figure of Joseph Keith during Heath’s government that initiated the spread of freedom ideas and the fight against socialism. He set up in 1974 the Centre for Policy Studies as a think-tank that

Should Graffiti Be Considered An Art - 929 Words

There appears to be many problems that are agued back and forth between different people. Controversy issues are debated on a number of occasions but one that can always be argued is the question of can graffiti be considered an art. The definition of art is â€Å"something that is created with imagination and skill† (Webster dictionary). When people argue graffiti is just a crime done they do not look at the definition of art and how graffiti falls under the definition. Graffiti should not be considered a crime but a form of art. Graffiti can be found in various parts of the world and on anything that can be painted. It is considered to be an â€Å"illegal ‘eyesore’† but has been starting to be considered an art form (Sanchez). This art form can be found anywhere including building, trucks, and bridges. Graffiti can be done by anyone with can of spray paint and could be done for any reason. The main reason one involves themselves in graffiti is the â€Å"adrenaline† that comes with it and also it can be a way to â€Å"connect with culture that broke down social, economic, and political barriers† (Nick A.J). graffiti can be done as a rebellious act but most of the time is just done for complete fun. Graffiti is just a form of art for people to express themselves and put the art on public display for all to see when walking down a street or driving on the road. This art form has various forms with different names including tagging, throw up, wildstyle and many more. Tagging is the â€Å"simpliest†Show MoreRelatedGraffiti As A Modern Form Of Art888 Words   |  4 PagesArt has been a highly valued way of expressing oneself in any culture. Through the use of the artistic skill one can show the oppression that may be felt from society, or to develop a certain style that follows what the culture is up to date with and problems that may need some emphasis to be noticed. Art is not only left for the artistically skilled to do anyone who can develop a thought and can put artistic meaning on their own creative canvas can be considered an artist. Graffiti has been consideredRead MoreChallenging Modest Culture : Society s Tolerance Of Public Art1399 Words   |  6 PagesSociety s Tolerance of Public Art The cutting edge of the public art development, connected with the hip-hop society of breakdancing and rap music, began with African-American and Latino teenagers in Philadelphia and New York in the late 1960s (MacDonald 1). At that time graffiti to most, was considered to be a form of art work. Regardless of those that thought of it as art, there were and are still numerous individuals that loathe the graffiti movement. Works of art have been dependably charmingRead MoreEssay Graffiti: Art or Vandalism?1139 Words   |  5 PagesArt: the ultimate form of self expression. But, what constitutes an art? And, who decides? These very questions plague society as it tries to decide and define the official status of graffiti--art or vandalism? Because it has found its way into art galleries and because of the community of artists who challenge and inspire each other, graffiti should be considered art and as a way to express oneself. The origin and history of graffiti is not what one might expect. Believed to have been created byRead MoreIs Graffiti Really Art?974 Words   |  4 PagesIs Graffiti Really Art? Is graffiti seen as vandalism or a notable art that is used to voice the opinion of many artists? Many are quick to conclude that graffiti is an act of defacing public property, but few are in understanding of what real graffiti is. Graffiti is defined as art that is displayed or created in public spaces. So this presents the question of why some critics believe that graffiti should not be classified as a real subcategory of art. Below is the explanation as to why graffitiRead MoreEssay on Modern Street Art vs. Graffiti933 Words   |  4 Pagesstreet art and graffiti are undeniably tied together. Graffiti could be considered the forefather of street art in many ways- it has paved the way for the development of modern street art. Yet, while both are still hotly debated topics, street art is seen in a more positive light while graffiti is still considered to be a negative term. Graffiti is associated with the vandalism that the government desperately wanted to erase. Graffiti has pla yed a huge role in the development of street art that weRead MoreGraffiti And Street Art Museum1650 Words   |  7 Pageson a train, the mobile art museum known as graffiti passes you. Graffiti has been integrated into the everyday life regardless of city size or laws. By definition, graffiti is any type of writing or drawing scribbled, scratched or sprayed onto a surface in public. Freehanded graffiti has evolved into a premeditated version known as street art. Graffiti and street art allows artists worldwide to express themselves in their entirety. However, these forms of art are considered vandalism because the majorityRead MoreAnalysis Of The Painting Two Women Of The Woods By Vincent Van Gogh1505 Words   |  7 Pagesby Banksy, an English graffiti artist, was brought to the auction in Paris and its recent price has reached  £445,792, which is roughly at $676,000 (Banksy, 2014; Banksy s Silent Majority fetches more than  £445k in Paris, 2015). As they are clearly seen, the prices for the two paintings are about the same, which is interesting because one is obviously a well-known artist all over the world, whereas the other one is known for his graffiti paintings, which is also considered to be an act of vandalismRead MoreGraffiti Is A Form Of Art1019 Words   |  5 Pages93 01 December 2016 Graffiti is Art Graffiti is a form of art well known in the street art. There are many forms of arts like drawing, painting, sculpture, or graffiti. Graffiti is an art used for the community to send messages as well as representing for community identity and pride through Graffiti artwork. In the book â€Å"Read Write Connect† by Kathleen Green Amy Lawler, chapter 22 Public Art talks about what graffiti art, vandalism art is, the differences between graffiti artwork and vandalismRead MoreGraffiti As A Sustainable And Decent Art Form1397 Words   |  6 Pagesongoing debates among multiple stakeholders regarding the nature and acceptability of graffiti as a sustainable and decent art form. Having gained immense popularity in urban environments, graffiti has always been on the verge between art and vandalism. The reason for such controversial perceptions lies in the definition of graffiti and its origins. As Campos defines it, â€Å"graffiti and street art could be considered a practice th rough which individuals appropriate the city† and whose nature â€Å"is consistentlyRead MoreGraffiti: Art or Vandalism Essay examples1453 Words   |  6 Pagesis recognized as art and vandalism. The individual is often faced with uncertainty when the topic of graffiti arises. The public often portray graffiti as a destructive act towards his or her surroundings however; graffiti can also be considered a form of self-expression. Many questions can be made pertaining to the graffiti movement, but the main question is graffiti a crime or an art? The answers lie in the complex phrase of â€Å"beauty is in the eye of the beholder†. Graffiti portrays contemporary

Why I am against the death penalty Free Essays

Why I am against the decease punishment The decease punishment has been used for old ages as a manner to penalize the guilty. Over the old ages the decease punishment has cost our Justice system 1000000s. Besides the cost, it violates our Human Rights Bill and punishes the guiltless people. We will write a custom essay sample on Why I am against the death penalty or any similar topic only for you Order Now The decease punishment is non effectual at cut downing offense. Our society is non any safer and does non discourage people from interrupting the jurisprudence. There are many different options in our system to contend offense, but the decease punishment in non one of them. The decease punishment is supposed prevent others from killing but it does non. Harmonizing to â€Å" Death Penalty Information Center the top academic criminological societies, 88 % of these experts rejected the impression that the decease punishment acts as a hindrance to slaying. † Fear of the decease punishment has small consequence on people perpetrating slaying. A slaying it normally starts, as an statement gone bad when the individual is angry. The mean individual does non walk outside and says, â€Å" I think I will kill today † . No 1 makes decease punishment their first thought when they leave the house. It ne’er crosses the people mind: if they kill a individual, they will acquire the decease punishment. Peoples are still killing and it has non slowed down the figure of slaying instances in the US. If the decease punishment is directing a message, unluckily no 1 is listening to the message. Second, the decease punishment cost more for an executing versus life in prison. Our state spends 1000000s to put to death captives versus go forthing them in prison. Our state is holding a budget crisis but it seem like we have 1000000s of dollars for the decease punishment. Harmonizing to â€Å" Death Penalty Information Center â€Å" California spends it cost $ 232.7 million per twelvemonth. A captive can pass life without parole cost $ 90,000 a twelvemonth per inmate. † We spend a immense sum for a system that has small consequence on offense. Third, the decease punishment goes against our Human Right Bill. On December 10, 1948, United Nations adopted the Human Rights Bill. Harmonizing to Article 5 provinces that â€Å" No 1 shall be subjected to torment or to cruel, inhuman or degrading intervention or penalty † . The decease punishment is hardhearted to worlds and a barbarous penalty. We say do non kill, but we are making the same thing. A signifier in which a human life is being taken by executing is unmerciful. Many captives reform while they are in prison. Criminals have committed some indefinable offenses, but they do non merit to hold their life to stop. The US has changed the significance of Human Rights Bill to warrant our system subsiding of tonss against another. In 1986, 48 states has get rid of the decease punishment. Fourth, the decease punishment has executed people who are non guilty. If we continue the Death punishment, non guilty people will decease. Harmonizing to decease Penalty Information Center â€Å" Since 1973, over 130 people have been released from decease row with grounds of their artlessness. From 2000-2007, there has been an norm of 5 exonerations per twelvemonth † . The job with the decease punishment is that guiltless people is killed. The system makes errors and do non ever have the grounds when convicting people. Many captives spend old ages functioning clip for a offense they did non make. There is no justness for them or their households. Justice system do non oppugn how many non guilty has died. We can penalize them stop other ways beside the decease punishment. They argue that the decease punishment put to deathing those that are guilty. Capital penalty takes many stairss to guarantee that fewer errors is made. In support of their side it is true that felons get a just test in the legal system. Our system assures that lives will be save by executing, merely the opposite there small grounds to turn out that the decease punishment saves lives. Retribution for a offense means the justness system is traveling to acquire even for the offense you committed. Retribution it is a barbarous manner for our justness system warranting what they are making. Taking the life of the people who has killed, we are making the same offense. Killing the felon is non traveling to convey back the victim. We justified it by stating it will convey closer to the victims ‘ households. The victim household heals no faster than they did while the captive was in gaol. They will sorrow the same manner in the same sum of clip. The system is adding slaying on top of slaying there is no terminal to offense. The rhythm goes on and does non stop and the whole intent is the stop slaying. At some point, the system has to confront world and happen another manner that works. Criminal ‘s carry out slaying it is the lowest signifier of offense and the system does the same thing but it gets a enthusiast name. Despite the claim that capital penalty can function as a manner to halt felons. Showing would be felons the effects of their actions. There is a jurisprudence and justness system and you have followed it. The decease punishment should do people believe before making a offense but it is merely the antonym. All things consider the justness system is morally incorrect when it comes to the decease punishment. The cost to put to death a individual is more expensive than life in prison without word. Knowing that guiltless people will be executed it is hardhearted manner of penalty. We should concentrate more on how stop and prevent offense. How to cite Why I am against the death penalty, Essay examples

Economy in the Hospitality Sector-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the application of the idea experience Economy in the Hospitality Sector. Answer: Introduction The management of the hospitality and hotel is an evolving process. The history of the hospitality industry highlights that this industry has transformed from social construct to a commercial phenomenon. However, the hospitality industry is a sector of social integration, where people come from different cultures and religions (Loureiro 2014). A cultural diversity occurs in the hospitality industry, which is an important aspect of the social construction. In the recent years, hospitality sectors are considered as the commercial place as it contributes a good proportion of the economy of a country. This sector is associated with the social development and economic development of a country. This study deals with the role of experience economy approach, which ensures that hospitality differs from past cultural, social and historical meaning of hospitality. Hospitality industry and the experience economy approach Experience economy is considered as the fundamental change that is currently going on the modern economy (Ali et al. 2016). In the recent years, service or goods are predominate economic offering in the industrial economy. In the hospitality sectors the goods are treated as the commodity and it can move from the industrial economy to a service economy. For the hospitality sectors, the experience economy focuses on the customer's experience. However, customer's experience refers to the interaction between the customer and the organization based on the service or product. The hospitality sectors provide service to the customers to engage them with their organization. As for example, Hotel Windsor a popular hotel in Australia focuses more to enhance their customer experience by offering innovative service to their customers. They offer the online opportunity to the customers to book the service. This is a significant way of such organization to enhance the customer experience (Thehotelw indsor.com.au 2018). They have various departments to complete their operation, which allows such organization to solve the customer query. However, they have a special department to solve the customer query regarding any service within 10 hours. This enhances their economy by increasing the customer experience. Experience economy in a hospitality sectors highlights the experience that the customer obtains from the seller in exchange for money (Manthiou et al. 2014). However, experience economy is a new economic era, where the business industry makes a memorable event for their consumers. In the context of the hospitality industry, customers have a high expectation regarding the service. Hence, hotels have to increase their customer service as well as the facility which will make their customer valuable. However, if the hospitality sectors provide excellent service to the customers then it will help them to satisfy their customers and build a good relationship with the customers. Service and products of the hospitality industry play an important role to add value to the customers. However, if the hospitality sector provides a comfortable and spontaneous service along with the effective communication then it will be beneficial to enhance the customer experience in the experience economic era. Role of experience economy approach to understand that hospitality industry differs from the previous cultural social and historical meaning of hospitality In previous hospitality industry is associated with the social integration. However, social class, status, and ethnicity have a great impact on the hospitality sectors. The hospitality industry provides economic support in the development of the education. On the other hand, it provides protection to the visitors while they are staying in a hotel or hospitality sector. Therefore, the cultural meaning of the hospitality industry refers to the cultural diversity in this industry. People from different cultural backgrounds come to visit in the hospitality sectors. This allows such sectors to bring cultural diversity in their organization. Hence, this industry has a great contribution to the social and cultural development. The historical meaning of the hospitality industry focuses that the term hospitality, which means the taking care, helping and pampering others (Radder and Han 2015). In previous, the aim of the hospitality industry was to provide excellent customer service and to sat isfy their customers. There was no account of analyzing the customer experience in this industry. The idea experience economy ensures that hospitality sector is not just the cultural and social development but it has more importance in enhancing the customer experience (Chang 2018). Therefore, to meet the needs of the customers is not one and only motto of the hospitality industry. In the recent years, this sector gives their concern to the customer experience by providing unique service. Experience is the core area of the hospitality industry as by enhancing the customer experience this sector can enhance their economic growth. As for example, Hotel Windsor offers far-reaching service to the customers by creating a unique design in their setting. They have various small departments and each of the department is specialized for a particular service to provide a better service to the customers. Such design in their organization is helpful for them to make their business unique in the global market. According to the previous concept, the customers buy quality and service from the hospitality industry. However, experience economy approach shows that customers buy experience and memory from the hospitality industry rather than the service quality and service delivery (Harkison et al. 2018). Hospitality industry offers accommodation and catering service to the customers, which highlights the experience economy as it provides more experience to the visitors along with improving the economy. Hence, it can be said that hospitality sectors are not only associated with the cultural and social development and the delivery of the service but also enhances the customer experience. This sector not only just sells the service but also sells the experience to the customers. Conclusion The entire piece of the study deals with the experience economy approach in the context of the hospitality sector. However, experience economy focuses on the customer experience. As per the history, the hospitality sector is considered as the place of social and cultural integration, where people from different cultures come and take service. Hence, this sector has great contribution in developing cultural diversity in their business by providing service. However, as per the concept of experience economy, it has been found that hospitality industry is a sector, from where customers buy experience in terms of service. References Ali, F., Amin, M. and Cobanoglu, C., 2016. An integrated model of service experience, emotions, satisfaction, and price acceptance: an empirical analysis in the Chinese hospitality industry.Journal of Hospitality Marketing Management,25(4), pp.449-475. Chang, S., 2018. Experience economy in hospitality and tourism: Gain and loss values for service and experience.Tourism Management,64, pp.55-63. Harkison, T., Hemmington, N.R. and Hyde, K.F., 2018. Creating the luxury accommodation experience: case studies from New Zealand.International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, (just-accepted), pp.00-00. Loureiro, S.M.C., 2014. The role of the rural tourism experience economy in place attachment and behavioral intentions.International Journal of Hospitality Management,40, pp.1-9. Manthiou, A., Lee, S., Tang, L. and Chiang, L., 2014. The experience economy approach to festival marketing: Vivid memory and attendee loyalty.Journal of Services Marketing,28(1), pp.22-35. Radder, L. and Han, X., 2015. An examination of the museum experience based on Pine and Gilmore's experience economy realms.Journal of Applied Business Research,31(2), p.455. Thehotelwindsor.com.au. 2018.Hotel Windsor. [online] Available at: https://www.thehotelwindsor.com.au/en/default.html?utm_source=googleutm_medium=organicutm_campaign=local [Accessed 17 Feb. 2018].